Difference between revisions of "Walkovszky v. Carlton"

From Clever Camel Wiki
Jump to navigationJump to search
(Created page with '== Plaintiff == Walkovsky (hit by a cab) == Defendant == Carlton (claimed to be a stockholder of 10 corporations, each of which has 2 cabs registered to its name) == Plaintiff …')
(No difference)

Revision as of 16:26, 5 October 2010

Plaintiff

Walkovsky (hit by a cab)

Defendant

Carlton (claimed to be a stockholder of 10 corporations, each of which has 2 cabs registered to its name)

Plaintiff Argument

The plaintiff claims that all of these corporations are operated "as a single entity, unity, and enterprise". He also thinks that the stockholders should be liable because the purpose of the current corporate structure is to defraud members of the public.